linux-kernel - Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EE8F8B2.3020203@landley.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:27:46 -0600
From:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	slyich@...il.com, aboriginal@...ts.landley.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, jakub@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

On 12/14/2011 01:13 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300
> 
>>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
>>>
>>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
>>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
>>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>
>> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>
>>
>> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks!
> 
> Thanks for testing Sergei.
> 

Is that the line we're using now?  I'm out of touch...

Tested-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/