linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] trace: add ability to collect call chain of non-current task.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EE903B1.7000600@fb.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:14:41 -0800
From:	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To:	<avagin@...nvz.org>
CC:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] trace: add ability to collect call chain of non-current
 task.



On 12/9/11 3:07 AM, Andrey Vagin wrote:

>> Attached is an alternative approach that does what you allude to above.
>
> * Your method doesn't work for rt scheduler.

This is no worse than sched_stat_{iowait,sleep} which are also CFS specific?

> * It doesn't distinguish blocking time and sleeping time.

Can't we distinguish based on next->state?

> * This patch does a bit mess between subsystems...

Which subsystems?

>> perf record -agPe sched:sched_switch --filter "delay > 1000000" --
>> sleep 1
>
> Why do you need the option "-a" ?
>

I'd love to see it work without the -a (so normal users can use it).

I guess I'll need to move the trace_sched_switch() tracepoint to be 
after perf_event_task_sched_in() in finish_task_switch().


>>
>> allows us to collect a lot less. For some reason, "perf script" shows
>
>> the correct delay field, but the sample period still contains 1 (i.e
>> __perf_count() hint is not working for me).
>
> Which kernel do you use? Does it contain "[PATCH] event: don't divide
> events if it has field period"? It works fine with my kernel...
>

I was using 3.2-rc2. I picked up the patch you reference above.

# perf report -D | grep SAMPLE.*period:
3 1437330416084 0x26d908 [0x250]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 7276/7806: 
0xffffffff8102c0a7 period: 140736819516096 addr: 0
3 1437330422290 0x26db58 [0x250]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 7276/7806: 
0xffffffff8102c0a7 period: 140736819516096 addr: 0
3 1437330428485 0x26dda8 [0x250]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 7276/7806: 
0xffffffff8102c0a7 period: 140736819516096 addr: 0

# perf script | grep next_comm=test.*delay | head -3
             test 13070 [023]  1437.320529: sched_switch: 
prev_comm=kworker/0:1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> 
next_comm=test next_pid=13070 next_prio=120 delay=1096877
             test 13070 [023]  1437.320531: sched_switch: 
prev_comm=kworker/0:1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> 
next_comm=test next_pid=13070 next_prio=120 delay=1096877
             test 13070 [023]  1437.320532: sched_switch: 
prev_comm=kworker/0:1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> 
next_comm=test next_pid=13070 next_prio=120 delay=1096877

The period still looks bogus i.e. doesn't match delay.

Thanks for reviewing. I'll clean up some of these issues and post a new 
patch in a couple of days.

  -Arun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/