[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111214203153.GB24496@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:31:53 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Jason Liu <jason.hui@...aro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/imx: propagate error from of_alias_get_id instead
of using -ENODEV
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:26:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> A quick look at of_alias_get_id shows that in the error case it returns
> -ENODEV, too, but still it's better style to propagate the value as is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
> Cc: Jason Liu <jason.hui@...aro.org>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> index 163fc90..75c159a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> @@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ static int serial_imx_probe_dt(struct imx_port *sport,
> ret = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id, errno %d\n", ret);
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return ret;
> }
> sport->port.line = ret;
>
One more comment on serial_imx_probe_dt:
It is used as follows:
ret = serial_imx_probe_dt(sport, pdev);
if (ret == -ENODEV)
serial_imx_probe_pdata(sport, pdev);
IMHO you should distinguish here more carefully between the different
-ENODEV cases. It's OK to call serial_imx_probe_pdata() if
!pdev->dev.of_node
but if
of_alias_get_id(np, "serial")
returns an error isn't that something that should make the probing of
the device fail instead of relying on platform data and the device id
that are non-existant and more or less random respectively if the device
is instantiated by dt?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists