linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix order_base

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:55:34 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix order_base_2(0)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:40 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> The order_base_2() function is either wrongly documented or wrongly
> implemented.  In the preceding comment, it says that:
>
>        ob2(0) = 0

Let's just remove that comment. That's just crazy math and makes no
sense. Why would anybody do ilog2() on zero and expect anything valid?

At least "-1" would make a tiny amount as sense as an error return or
"underflow" or whatever. But returning 0 is just wrong. That's
ilog2(1), not 0.

Does anybody actually *want* order_base_2(0)?

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/