[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111215081056.GC4475@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:10:56 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sanghyun Lee <sanghyun75.lee@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Younglak Kim <younglak1004.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Initialize domain->handler in
iommu_domain_alloc()
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:14:26PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> Since it is not guaranteed that an iommu driver initializes in its
> domain_init() function, it must be initialized with NULL to prevent
> calling a function in an arbitrary location when iommu fault occurred.
>
> Signed-off-by: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 7cc3c65..1afb896 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain_alloc(struct bus_type *bus)
> return NULL;
>
> domain->ops = bus->iommu_ops;
> + domain->handler = NULL;
Good catch. But it is better to change the kmalloc in the function to
kzalloc. This will implicitly initialize all future members correctly.
Thanks,
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists