[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201112151001.52761.oneukum@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:01:52 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Cc: jkosina@...e.cz, bleung@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
olofj@...omium.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] HID: usbhid: defer LED setting to a workqueue
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 07:43:09 schrieb Daniel Kurtz:
Hi,
> I'm sorry, I'm not seeing how using a workqueue to set the LEDs
> changes anything with respect to how the driver deals with USB reset.
You are unfortunately right. This means that the driver currently is already
buggy.
> With or without a workqueue, LED control urbs are being queued and/or
> submitted asynchronously to reset. AFAICT, the only thing that
> changes here is exactly when __usbhid_submit_report() is called. In
> the original case, this happens directly in the input event handler.
> In the workqueue case, it happens in a system worker thread some short
> time after the input handler finishes.
The current driver kills the ctrl URB in cease_io() which is not enough
to prevent new IO.
> Could you please be more specific about what this patch breaks and
> perhaps give some guidance on how to fix it?
It breaks nothing. It just continues a bug and I assumed it was not present.
Basically the work queue must do nothing after pre_reset() and post_reset()
ought to rerun the work in case some request came down during that time.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists