[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EE9C274.3030603@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:48:36 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
ryanh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@...ibm.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 V5] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped
by host
On 12/14/2011 07:58 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > I don't think you should see a guest softlockup if the host is
> > overloaded. Nor should you see it due to a long live migration pause,
> > or STOP/CONT. You should see a guest softlockup if it is spinning due
> > to a guest bug, and not for any other reason.
> >
> > I think we need a mix of the ioctl (for STOP/CONT and voluntary pauses,
> > like live migration or qemu stop/cont) and preempt notifiers (together
> > with a check for TASK_RUNNING/TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, for scheduling or
> > swap delays)
> >
>
> Do you want the preemption notifier work in before you will consider merging
> this set, or can that be a follow on?
Yes please.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists