[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111215200631.GA2379@Neptun>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:06:31 +0100
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] audit: fix mark refcounting
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> + audit_get_parent(parent);
> fsnotify_destroy_mark(&parent->mark);
> + audit_put_parent(parent);
Hi,
What about taking an extra ref on an inode mark in send_to_group()
before we call handle_event()?
So we dont have to handle the cases in which a mark is destroyed
explicitly...
Lino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists