[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871us6sdaz.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:21:00 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] params: <level>_initcall-like kernel parameters
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:57:06 +0000, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com> wrote:
> This patch adds a set of macros that can be used to declare
> kernel parameters to be parsed _before_ initcalls at a chosen
> level are executed. Such parameters are marked using existing
> "flags" field of the "kernel_param" structure.
>
> Linker macro collating init calls had to be modified in order
> to add additional symbols between levels that are later used
> by the init code to split the calls into blocks.
This patch wasn't quite what I was thinking, but I've realized that
we can't put the params in the .init section, your approach is probably
the best one.
Note that I've just created a series which gets rid of that silly ISBOOL
thing, so you can use the whole field for "level". Then I set the level
to -1 for the normal calls; I want to use -2 for the early calls, but
that's not done yet...
I'll rework and rebase your patch like that now.
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists