linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACna6rz3qDpw4eJOoCXx7=z1719v7kS-Ou-WUseR9_vB-O2dag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:40:16 +0100
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Arend Van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15

W dniu 15 grudnia 2011 22:38 użytkownik John W. Linville
<linville@...driver.com> napisał:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> 2011/12/15 John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>:
>> > commit 42a3b63bb2ca4996a3d1210a004eae2333f1119e
>> >
>> > Dave,
>> >
>> > Here are a few more fixes intended for the 3.2 release.  They are
>> > all small and narrowly focused.
>>
>> John, I've made a mistake and didn't use [PATCH 3.2] header to make it
>> clean my patch is fix. Could you take a look at
>> [PATCH] bcma: support for suspend and resume
>> please?
>>
>> It's not one-liner, but fixes lock ups, which I believe - we really
>> want to avoid.
>
> It's late in the release cycle, and Dave specifically asked me to slow down.
>
> Are these suspend/resume lockups a regression?  Or have they always
> been there?  Do they happen to everyone?

The bug is present since first days of bcma. That's why I even decided
to add stable to CC.

Personally I've tested that only on 1 machine (I don't have more
suspendable machines with mini PCIe slot). However all Macbook 8.1/8.2
users have to remove b43 & bcma before suspending [0], they complain
about that since ever.

Arend: I know you're also complaining for suspend in bcma. Can you
comment on this?

[0] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1695746

-- 
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/