lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEB1508.3080405@parallels.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:53:12 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: fix sleeping while atomic problem in sock mem_cgroup.

On 12/16/2011 01:31 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 décembre 2011 à 13:09 +0400, Glauber Costa a écrit :
>> Since we can't scan the proto_list to initialize sock cgroups, as it
>> holds a rwlock, and we also want to keep the code generic enough to
>> avoid calling the initialization functions of protocols directly,
>> I propose we keep the interested parties in a separate list. This list
>> is protected by a mutex so we can sleep and do the necessary allocations.
>>
>> Also fixes a reference problem found by Randy Dunlap's randconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@...allels.com>
>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>> CC: David S. Miller<davem@...emloft.net>
>> CC: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> CC: Stephen Rothwell<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>> CC: Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net>
>> ---
>
> Sorry to come late, but why dont we convert proto_list_lock to a mutex ?

I didn't suggest this, as I imagined there could be some performance 
implications to be drawn from it that may not be obvious to me.

But if it is okay with you net guys, it is certainly okay with me as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ