[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMP44s3eeTOBRiFwEL3FypDY_+-MReqYJJVO1URNrnFVFXzvDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:59:57 +0200
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: musb: fix pm_runtime mismatches
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> Properly call pm_runtime_put() afer pm_runttime_get() on errors.
>>
>> Untested.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c | 1 +
>> drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
>> index 922148f..95bfd2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c
>> @@ -1960,6 +1960,7 @@ static int musb_gadget_start(struct usb_gadget *g,
>> err2:
>> if (!is_otg_enabled(musb))
>> musb_stop(musb);
>> + pm_runtime_put(musb->controller);
>> err0:
>> return retval;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
>> index ba85f27..4edfb91 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
>> @@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ static void omap2430_musb_disable(struct musb *musb)
>>
>> static int omap2430_musb_exit(struct musb *musb)
>> {
>> + pm_runtime_put(musb->controller);
>> del_timer_sync(&musb_idle_timer);
>>
>> omap2430_low_level_exit(musb);
>
> Should these calls be pm_runtime_put_sync() instead of
> pm_runtime_put()?
I don't see why... The thing failed, it's not going to be used any
more so better let PM deactivate the device. But now that you point
this out, pm_runtime_put() on omap2430_musb_exit() should probably go
at the end of the function, after all the actions have been done.
I'll send an updated patch tomorrow, if there are no further comments.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists