[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEB6479.8010500@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:32:09 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
fweisbec@...il.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use -m-omit-leaf-frame-pointer to shrink text size
On 12/16/2011 04:00 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> Are you sure about that even if the leaf function uses rBP for
>> a different purpose?
>
> Well, i assumed that GCC does not mess with %bp in leaf
> functions - a frame pointer is barely useful if it's destroyed
> spuriously in leaf functions.
>
We should verify that explicitly. gcc has every "right" to treat it as
a normal callee-saved register, but I think it is a very low priority
register in gcc's register allocation scheme.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists