[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEA8D43.8090506@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:13:55 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86, mce: Add mechanism to safely save information
in MCE handler
(2011/12/15 8:55), Tony Luck wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 645070f..7d7303a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -887,6 +887,49 @@ static void mce_clear_state(unsigned long *toclear)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Need to save faulting physical address associated with a process
> + * in the machine check handler some place where we can grab it back
> + * later in mce_notify_process()
> + */
> +#define MAX_MCE_INFO 16
(nitpick) IMHO, I'd prefer MCE_INFO_MAX.
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists