[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALdu-PCXb4W=LNHe14V3-EnqoPVVWkPRRGyeD+VAPrQuhXkFjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:35:34 -0800
From: Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
daniel.lezcano@...e.fr, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
jbottomley@...allels.com, pjt@...gle.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
bsingharora@...il.com, devel@...nvz.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] cgroup basic comounting
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 1fd7867..e894a4f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -1211,9 +1211,9 @@ static int parse_cgroupfs_options(char *data, struct cgroup_sb_opts *opts)
> set_bit(i, &opts->subsys_bits);
> one_ss = true;
>
> - break;
> + continue;
> }
> - if (i == CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT)
> + if (opts->subsys_bits == 0)
> return -ENOENT;
This is broken - it will silently ignore unknown/misspelled subsystems
that are specified after a valid subsystem. Replacing the break with a
continue is harmless but doesn't make sense - if the token already
matched a subsystem name then it won't match any other subsystem.
What change are you actually trying to effect with this patch?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists