linux-kernel - [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes (part two, against 3.2-rc)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111216182728.GB25457@shiny>
Date:	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:27:28 -0500
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes (part two, against 3.2-rc)

Hi everyone,

I try to keep most of the btrfs commits against the last release.  This
way, people can update their old and crusty kernels from 3 months ago,
and still have the latest btrfs code.

We do have one commit that is 3.2 specific though, so I put it into a
for-linus-3.2 branch:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus-3.2

Wu Fengguang noticed that btrfs' file write needs to consider the balance
dirty thresholds when it allows big multi-page writes.

Wu Fengguang (1) commits (+2/-0):
    btrfs: lower the dirty balance poll interval

Total: (1) commits (+2/-0)

 fs/btrfs/file.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/