[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111216051609.GA4502@localhost>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:16:09 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: XFS/btrfs performance after IO-less dirty throttling
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:25:08PM +0800, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:53:11AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > I'm indeed happy that you don't care that much on that regression
> > introduced by me ;-)
>
> Heh.
>
> BTW, do these tests run to ENOSPC?
Nope. Shall ENOSPC (performance) be tested?
> > 10829.00 +4.3% 11296.00 TOTAL xfs:xfs_delalloc_enospc
>
> This implies that it does.
Not really. The USB key partition size is 7.1GB.
Even in the fastest 1dd case, only 4GB data is written:
wfg@bee /export/writeback% cat fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-1dd-1-3.2.0-rc3/ls-files
131 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 4060078080 Dec 8 15:57 /fs/sdb3/zero-1
That's about 6.7MB/s write bandwidth running for 600 seconds.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists