| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201112152137.29195.me@danielpalmer.co.uk> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:37:29 -0800 From: Daniel Palmer <me@...ielpalmer.co.uk> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Porting m68k/nommu to a new board. Hi, I'm building a custom machine based around a 68sec000 (Fully static 68ec000). The "board" is a bunch of parts at the moment but I have written a workable simulator for the machine which I am using as a testbed for testing things like my custom video, DMA controller etc before creating the hardware versions in VHDL. I'm interested in getting mmu-less m68k linux (what used to be known as uclinux I guess, seems to be known as m68k/nommu now) running on the simulator and later on the real hardware. >From what I can tell the nommu m68k port is still active. But does it actually work? All the details on similar hardware (like the older Palm pilots, Atari machines) is pretty ancient, around 2.0. Does anyone have a machine running a recent kernel? Were there issues getting it running? I did a bit of digging in the source and doesn't look like it should be too difficult to add the specifics for my machine.. I have a 16550 style UART emulated for I/O so I don't need to write a framebuffer driver at the moment. I'm open to any suggestions people have on how to approach this though. Please CC me as I'm not subscribed. Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists