linux-kernel - Re: Question about missing "cld" in x86 string assembly code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:39:03 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	nai.xia@...il.com, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about missing "cld" in x86 string assembly code

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The i386 ELF ABI states "The direction flag must be set to the
> ‘‘forward’’ (that is, zero) direction before entry and upon exit from
> a function."  Therefore it can be assumed to be clear, unless
> explicitly set.

The exception, of course, being bootup, fault and interrupt handlers,
and after we've called out to foreign code (ie BIOS).

So there *are* a few cld's sprinkled around, they are just fairly rare.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/