[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfuBxy7W3yZJ1rg3wxuxFbMJ51kogGxJPnBUO4OrVW8iPvOew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:10:48 -0700
From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: jbaron@...hat.com, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/25] dynamic_debug: Introduce global fake module param $module.dyndbg
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:12:44 -0700, jim.cromie@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
>>
>> Rework Thomas Renninger's $module.ddebug boot-time debugging feature,
>> from https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/15/397
>
> OK, this looks cleaner!
>
> s/modname/doing/ here, since it's a generic callback.
>
> s/modname/doing/ (or /s/modname/unused/).
>
> Same as above.
>
> s/modname/doing/ here too, makes it clear.
>
> ... again....
All done, to be sent shortly.
Thanks
>
>> +/* find & process .dyndbg params (prefixed by modname) in cmdline */
>> +static __init void ddebug_boot_parse_args(void)
>> +{
>
> OK, I don't get why you are doing your own parsing for builtins?
>
After some poking around I didnt want to thrash too much,
and went for Thomas' original approach for builtins.
> Can't you call something from init/main.c:unknown_bootoption()?
>
> If that's too early, I have a patch we're working on which adds
> parameter parsing to each initlevel.
>
It looks too early (unless Ive misunderstood)
dynamic_debug is enabled via arch_initcall
977 static int __init dynamic_debug_init(void)
978 {
...
1018 }
1019 ddebug_boot_parse_args();
...
1027 }
1028 /* Allow early initialization for boot messages via boot param */
1029 arch_initcall(dynamic_debug_init);
1030 /* Debugfs setup must be done later */
1031 module_init(dynamic_debug_init_debugfs);
Do you have a pointer to that patch ?
Is it targetted for v3.3 ?
If so, it sounds like I should aim to use it.
BTW, is this/your desc of arg-processing still accurate/current/complete ?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/767172/focus=767361
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
thank you
Jim Cromie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists