linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:40:39 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>
Cc:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@...escale.com>,
	Liu Shuo-B35362 <B35362@...escale.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org list" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support

On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:13 +0000, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedekind1@...il.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:51 PM
> >To: Kumar Gala
> >Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472; Liu Shuo-B35362; linux-
> >kernel@...r.kernel.org Kernel; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org; Andrew
> >Morton; David Woodhouse; linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org list
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Integrated Flash Controller support
> >
> >On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:47 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> As Scott said, I was more asking about the 2nd patch in the
> sequence
> >> which did touch MTD.  Since that one is dependent on this patch,
> >> wondering how we wanted to handle them.
> >
> >I do not have time to review it, but it looks OK, so I'd suggest to
> >merge it vie the same tree as the rest of the patches.
> 
> Hi Artem,
> 
> So what is your suggestion on this patch?  Can we regard your previous
> email as an ACK and merge it through the powerpc tree?  Or do you
> prefer to merge them through the MTD tree with Kumar's ACK instead?

I am fine if it is merged via PPC tree. I do not have bandwith to look
at it closely, so I cannot ack it, although I also do not have reasons
to nack it :-)

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)