[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-1affc46cffad9f2bc7c9ffec85726446903a58f9@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:51:33 -0800
From: tip-bot for Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
jj@...osbits.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/cleanups] x86: Use "do { } while(0)" for empty lock_cmos(
)/unlock_cmos() macros
Commit-ID: 1affc46cffad9f2bc7c9ffec85726446903a58f9
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1affc46cffad9f2bc7c9ffec85726446903a58f9
Author: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
AuthorDate: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:05:31 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:14:31 +0100
x86: Use "do { } while(0)" for empty lock_cmos()/unlock_cmos() macros
gcc noticed (when using -Wempty-body) that our use of
lock_cmos() and unlock_cmos() in
arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h is potentially problematic :
arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:32:15: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body]
arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:40:16: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body]
Let's just use the standard 'do {} while (0)' solution. That
shuts up gcc and also prevents future problems if the macros
should end up being used in a similar situation elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.00.1112180103130.21784@swampdragon.chaosbits.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h
index 01fdf56..0e8e85b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ static inline unsigned char current_lock_cmos_reg(void)
#else
#define lock_cmos_prefix(reg) do {} while (0)
#define lock_cmos_suffix(reg) do {} while (0)
-#define lock_cmos(reg)
-#define unlock_cmos()
+#define lock_cmos(reg) do { } while (0)
+#define unlock_cmos() do { } while (0)
#define do_i_have_lock_cmos() 0
#define current_lock_cmos_reg() 0
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists