[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEDFE4E.6090104@nod.at>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:53:02 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_dh: Fix return value of scsi_dh_attach()
Am 18.12.2011 15:45, schrieb James Bottomley:
> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 15:43 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 18.11.2011 00:34, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>>> scsi_dh_attach() should return a negative value on error.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>>> ---
>>> include/scsi/scsi_dh.h | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h b/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h
>>> index e3f2db2..e07ab10 100644
>>> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h
>>> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_dh.h
>>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline int scsi_dh_handler_exist(const char *name)
>>> }
>>> static inline int scsi_dh_attach(struct request_queue *req, const char *name)
>>> {
>>> - return SCSI_DH_NOSYS;
>>> + return -SCSI_DH_NOSYS;
>>> }
>>> static inline void scsi_dh_detach(struct request_queue *q)
>>> {
>>
>> James,
>>
>> can you please pickup this patch?
>
> It still needs an ack from rdac people (other one just got overlooked).
>
Who are the rdac people?
I sent the patch to all addresses reported by get_maintainers.pl.
Thanks,
//richard
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists