[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae462f089fd4375fe44b09361fb955af@server102.greatnet.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:22:13 +0100
From: Benjamin Block <bebl@...eta.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
<eranian@...gle.com>, <brgerst@...il.com>,
<robert.richter@....com>, <Andreas.Herrmann3@....com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Block <benjamin.block@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/5] x86, perf: implements lwp-perf-integration (rc1)
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:04:43 +0100, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com> wrote:
>
>> From: Benjamin Block <benjamin.block@....com>
>>
>> Implements a basic integration of LWP into perf. Permits a way
>> to create a perf-event that will be backed by LWP. The PMU
>> creates the required structures and userspace-memories. The
>> PMU also collects the samples from the ring-buffer, but as
>> there is currently no interrupt- and overflow-implementation,
>> they are not reported (TODO).
>
> Ok, this is a step in the right direction - once the threshold
> IRQ flow control mechanism is implemented we are looking at
> something that might be mergeable. Any ETA on those bits?
>
The threshold-interrupt is already integrated with patch 5 of this
patch-set.
Maybe I wrote the descriptions a little misleading. Sry for that. :)
best regards,
- Benjamin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists