[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111219013235.GA4962@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:32:36 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:55:48AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi Stephen,
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c between commit 1237f0f6ecf6 ("ARM: 7198/1:
> arm/imx6: add restart support for imx6q") from the arm tree and commit
> 477fce49aef4 ("arm/imx6q-sabrelite: add enet phy ksz9021rn fixup") from
> the arm-soc tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
It looks all right. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists