[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEF351E.8040002@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:59:10 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
arnd@...db.de, ryanh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@...ibm.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 V5] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped
by host
On 12/16/2011 11:31 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > > Slow enough that progress of the watchdog thread is unable to keep up
> > > with timer interrupt processing. This is considered a hang and
> > > should be reported.
> >
> > It's not a guest hang though!
>
> No, but your host system is in such a load state that for the sake of
> system usability you better print out a warning message.
What's the point in printing it in the guest? The guest can't observe
host conditions.
> I don't see the advantage of preempt notifiers over the simple, paravirt
> solution proposed? Note kvmclock is already paravirt.
Right.
> What do you want to be done in preempt notifiers? Measure what to
> consider setting this flag?
Preemption while TASK_RUNNING or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists