[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111219161932.GA10017@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:19:32 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
oprofile-list <oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] oprofile: Fix uninitialized memory access when
writing to
* Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com> wrote:
> On 19.12.11 15:17:03, Robert Richter wrote:
> > On 19.12.11 15:00:49, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > + if (!count)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > retval = oprofilefs_ulong_from_user(&value, buf, count);
> > > if (retval)
> > > return retval;
> > >
> > > See the ugly and fragile pattern?
> > >
> > > This should *really* be solved via the
> > > oprofilefs_ulong_from_user() helper function, not by sprinkling
> > > the !count checks in half a dozen places ...
> >
> > Hmm, I thought there was no way to leave the code path with count == 0
> > and retval. But thinking about it it would be possible with returning
> > count or errors < 0. Will improve the patch.
>
> Ingo, see my updated version below. [...]
Yeah, this looks a lot cleaner.
> [...] I am fine with appling it directly on tip/perf/urgent.
Applied,
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists