[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111219200603.126287ed@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:06:03 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:30:09 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > That way your commits are preserved and the conflicts are
> > > resolved.
> >
> > Just did that and pushed out the result on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git cputime-tip
>
> Hm, this fails spectacularly on 32-bit x86:
>
> /home/mingo/tip/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy':
> /home/mingo/tip/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:137: error: expected ';' before ')' token
> /home/mingo/tip/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:137: error: expected statement before ')' token
Arg, sorry. Once more with feeling. I've replaced cputime-tip with a version
that survived "make allmodconfig; make" on x86-32, x86-64, powerpc and s390
(with JUMP_LABEL=n, there is another bug lurking). ia64, the third architecture
with VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y, does not compile due to a cyclic dependency in
asm-offsets.c vs sched.h. Now it only has to work ..
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists