[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEF960F.1070909@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:52:47 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix BUILD_BUG assertion in pmdp_clear_flush_young()
On 12/19/2011 11:29 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, David Daney wrote:
>
>> From: David Daney<david.daney@...ium.com>
>>
>> It has been reported that when building for sh:
>>
>> mm/pgtable-generic.c: In function 'pmdp_clear_flush_young':
>> mm/pgtable-generic.c:76: error: call to '__build_bug_failed' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG failed
>>
>> Adding some ugle #ifdeffery will probably fix this issue.
>>
>
> It won't, CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE has nothing at all to do with this.
>
Sorry for the noise. You are correct.
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney<david.daney@...ium.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This is completely untested, but may be the best fix for this. Linus
>> and others have expressed a dislike for using BUG() to detect what
>> should be dead code paths at runtime, but it seems to be the state of
>> the art here.
>>
>
> The problem here is that HPAGE_PMD_MASK is being referenced without
> CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE. pmdp_clear_flush_young() is only applicable
> with that config option enabled. So rather than trying to minimize lines
> captured under an #ifdef by placing the BUG() directly in the function for
> asm-generic, you'll need to wrap pmd_clear_flush_young() with
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE and define its equivalent for
> CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=n that breaks the build if not enabled.
>
That does sound like a better option.
I still think having the BUILD_BUG defined as we do in Andrew Morton's
tree is the correct approach, and I don't want to see that reverted
because of this ugliness.
Really this is hackery that should be cleaned up as you suggest, instead
of being papered over with this BUG() thing. I can't test SH things,
otherwise I might look at it. The SH maintainers should probably take a
look instead.
David Daney
>> mm/pgtable-generic.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>> index eb663fb..73784c8 100644
>> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int pmdp_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmdp)
>> {
>> int young;
>> -#ifndef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) || !defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)
>> BUG();
>> #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>> VM_BUG_ON(address& ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists