[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEFC38C.4010201@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:06:52 +1100
From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] microblaze: Change NO_IRQ to 0
On 20/12/11 01:19, Michal Simek wrote:
> As has been discussed many times[1], Using NO_IRQ set to anything other
> than 0 is bug waiting to happen since many drivers follow the pattern
> "if (!irq)" for testing whether or not an irq has been set.
>
> This patch changes the Microblaze NO_IRQ setting from -1 to 0 to bring
> it in line with most of the rest of the kernel. It also prepares for
> Microblaze eventually supporting multiple interrupt controllers by
> breaking the assumption that hwirq# == Linux IRQ#. The Linux IRQ
> number is just a cookie with no guarantee of a direct relationship
> with the hardware irq arrangement.
>
> At this point, Microblaze interrupt handling only supports only one
> instance of one kind of interrupt controller (xilinx_intc). This change
> shouldn't affect any architecture code outside of the interrupt
> controller driver and the irq_of mapping.
>
> Updated to 3.2 and to use irq_data.hwirq by Rob Herring.
> Tested and fixed by Michal Simek.
>
> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
<snip>
> extern unsigned int nr_irq;
>
> -#define NO_IRQ (-1)
> +#define NO_IRQ 0
IIUC, NO_IRQ should actually be removed in favour of testing against
zero explictly. On Linus' latest tree there are three appearances of
NO_IRQ in arch/microblaze: this definition and two uses and
arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c. The latter should be removed by this
patch. I assume there are still uses of NO_IRQ in drivers used by
microblaze which prevent removal of NO_IRQ completely?
~Ryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists