[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111219232246.GB570@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:22:46 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, trenn@...e.de,
kay.sievers@....org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
kay.sievers@...y.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au, ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] crypto: Add support for x86 cpuid auto loading for
x86 crypto drivers
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 02:47:39PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> static int __init padlock_init(void)
> {
> int rc = -ENODEV;
> @@ -533,15 +540,8 @@ static int __init padlock_init(void)
> struct shash_alg *sha1;
> struct shash_alg *sha256;
>
> - if (!cpu_has_phe) {
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected.\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> - if (!cpu_has_phe_enabled) {
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "VIA PadLock detected, but not enabled. Hmm, strange...\n");
> + if (!x86_match_cpu(padlock_sha_ids) || !cpu_has_phe_enabled)
> return -ENODEV;
> - }
don't we want to keep the printk ?
Seems that if it's been disabled by the BIOS for some reason, it will now
silently fail instead of printing a nice warning.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists