[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEFCB57.8080203@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:40:07 -0800
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing, sched: Add delay info to sched_switch
On 12/19/11 3:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 00:28 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 15:23 -0800, Arun Sharma wrote:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
>>> + __entry->delay = next->se.statistics.block_start ? next->se.statistics.block_start
>>> + : next->se.statistics.sleep_start ? next->se.statistics.sleep_start : 0;
>>> + __entry->delay = __entry->delay ? now - __entry->delay : 0;
>>> +#else
>>> + __entry->delay = 0;
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I don't really like this, this should be one of those sched_*_stat
>> thingies, not sched_switch().
>
> Agreed.
How does:
sched_stat_sleeptime(current, now);
at the same point sound? I'll leave sched_switch() as is.
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists