[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111220163750.00e135c6@notabene.brown>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:37:50 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds-tca6507: allow driver to compile when GPIOLIB
is not available.
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:34:18 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> On 12/18/2011 04:20 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> > This driver can configure the outputs as GPIO line instead of LEDs. But
> > that only works if GPIOLIB is available. So make that code conditional
> > on the library's availability.
> >
> > Also remove the 'teardown' callback as it is never called and should
> > never be needed.
> >
> > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> with linux-next 20111219 and this patch applied, I now get:
>
> drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c: In function 'tca6507_remove':
> drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c:677:9: error: 'struct tca6507_chip' has no member named 'gpio'
> drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c:678:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiochip_remove'
> drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c:678:33: error: 'struct tca6507_chip' has no member named 'gpio'
>
> when GPIOLIB is not enabled.
Drat - I forgot the 'remove' code.
I cannot easily compile for an ARCH that doesn't include GPIOLIB, but it
seems that if I put
#undef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
at the top of leds-tca6507.c it comes close enough for testing.
So the next version should get that right. I'll repost.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists