linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111220110933.GA17430@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:09:33 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree


* Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:

> [...] I've replaced cputime-tip with a version that survived 
> "make allmodconfig; make" on x86-32, x86-64, powerpc and s390 
> (with JUMP_LABEL=n, there is another bug lurking). ia64, the 
> third architecture with VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y, does not 
> compile due to a cyclic dependency in asm-offsets.c vs 
> sched.h. Now it only has to work ..

It's looking good so far here. Pulled, thanks Martin!

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/