[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111220193055.GA26392@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:30:55 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix refill related races
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:09:46AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michael.
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:09:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Another question, wanted to make sure:
> > virtnet_poll does schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > separately refill work itself also does
> > schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);
> > If two such events happen twice, on different CPUs, we are still guaranteed
> > the work will only run once, right?
>
> No, it's not. Normal workqueues only guarantee non-reentrance on
> local CPU. If you want to guarantee that only one instance of a given
> item is executing across all CPUs, you need to use the nrt workqueue.
>
> Thanks.
Hmm, in that case it looks like a nasty race could get
triggered, with try_fill_recv run on multiple CPUs in parallel,
corrupting the linked list within the vq.
Using the mutex as my patch did will fix that naturally, as well.
Rusty, am I missing something?
> --
> tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists