linux-kernel - RE: [Regression, bisected] a3e06bbe8445f57eb949e6474c5a9b30f24d2057: KVM: emulate lapic tsc deadline timer for guest"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E2890487874@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 04:19:12 +0800
From:	"Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
To:	Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com>
CC:	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Garrett D'Amore <garrett@...enta.com>
Subject: RE: [Regression, bisected]
 a3e06bbe8445f57eb949e6474c5a9b30f24d2057: KVM: emulate lapic tsc deadline
 timer for guest"

Alexey Zaytsev wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 21:21, Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
> wrote: 
>> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Alexey Zaytsev
>>> <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Let me clarify the situation.
>>>> 
>>>> Before this commit, the tsc was advertised in cpuid, and it was
>>>> handled, if I understand things correctly, by qemu.
>>>> After this commit, the tsc is advertised in cpuid, and is handled
>>>> in the kernel, but only after qemu issues KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP. If
>>>> it does not issue the ioctl, the kernel just discards any wrmsrs
>>>> done to the tsc. This does not look like an Illumos problem to me.
>>>> Linux guests kind of work here, because they are  prepared to work
>>>> on utterly broken hardware. Good for you, but please don't break
>>>> less-prepared guests.
>>> 
>>> Yes. This is a regression, and needs to be fixed.
>>> 
>>> Liu, if you don't have time to debug it, we'll just revert the
>>> commit. It's that easy. Regressions are not allowed. There are no
>>> excuses. 
>>> 
>>> In particular, saying "just wait for qemu-kvm" is not an acceptable
>>> answer, because the point is that things *used* to work, and they
>>> broke. No "change it to work with the new kernel" allowed, except
>>> for some *very* rare critical circumstances (usually "major
>>> security-bug that we had to fix, and people who relied on it are
>>> thus out of luck"). 
>>> 
>>> Commit a3e06bbe8445 still seems to revert cleanly, so that is the
>>> easy option. 
>>> 
>>> That said, it sounds like maybe another solution is to start with
>>> the TSC_DEADLINE timer bit in cpuid cleared, and only setting it
>>> after the KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP ioctl. 
>>> 
>>> In fact, the patch is clearly buggy, in that it apparently doesn't
>>> emulate TSC_DEADLINE correctly and natively on its own.
>>> 
>>> Jan, Marcelo, Avi - is there a quick fix, or should I just revert?
>>> 
>>> And please don't *EVER* tell people that they should just work
>>> around regressions. Regressions are absolutely unacceptable. Kernel
>>> people need to understand that. 
>>> 
>>>                    Linus
>> 
>> Yes, my fault to say 'walk around' before knowing Alex's issue
>> clearly. 
>> 
>> After Alex send his last email to clarify the situation, I have
>> checked the bug. 
>> Basically it caused from
>> 1. qemu didn't issue KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP, hence
>> irqchip_in_kernel(kvm) fail when setup vcpu lapic logic at
>> kvm_arch_vcpu_init();  
>> 2. tsc deadline work based on vcpu lapic, hence break illumos;
>> 
>> A fix is to update cpuid, as you said, setting it after
>> KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP. I just wonder is there any better solution? so I
>> ask Alex his environment to setup at my side to do more test. If you
>> think kvm tsc deadline timer patch itself not clean, please tell me.
> 
> [Removed Linus from CC]
> 
> If your internet connection is good enough, I could just pass you the
> disk image. It should be around 5g when compressed. Otherwise, you can
> download an openindiana disk image from http://openindiana.org. You
> probably want the text-only "server" one. The TSC code has changed
> since that release, but the old one does not work as well.

I mean I will build environment at my side with your qemu version (where do you pull from? commit number?) --> just to verify whether we can solve it at qemu side, or, solve it by cpuid at kvm side.
I will present a patch to fix it and you can test at your environment.

> 
> Do I get it right that Linux does not use the tsc deadline timer? I've
> added printks to the
> kvm_get_lapic_tscdeadline_msr/kvm_set_lapic_tscdeadline_msr functions,
> and I swear I've seen them trigger a few times with the Linux guest.
> But I can't find the code that is issuing the msr reads/writes in the
> Linux kernel.

I will check it tomorrow, too late now.
and would you please tell me, does illumos use tsc deadline timer? I lack this basic information.

Thanks,
Jinsong--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/