linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/15] module_param: make bool parameters really bool (net & drivers/net)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87liq8m81o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:24:43 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] module_param: make bool parameters really bool (net & drivers/net)

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:22:10 -0500 (EST), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:19:52 +1030
> 
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:15:17 -0500 (EST), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> >> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:44:31 +1030
> >> 
> >> > Dave, did you want a true/false cleanup too?
> >> 
> >> Please, this kind of stuff rots forever and not using bool properly
> >> drives me crazy.
> > 
> > And here's the updated patch:
> 
> Neither of your two patches comes close to applying cleanly to net-next,
> even when I try to apply it by hand there are rejects and references to
> files that don't even exist in net-next any more.

Yeah, no surprise there.  Resending.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/