linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] cgroup: separate out cgroup_attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111221001347.GQ10752@google.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:13:47 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cgroup: separate out cgroup_attach_proc error
 handling code

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 04:02:31PM -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> > Hmm... maybe goto out_free_group_list?  Duplicating cleanup on success
> > and failure paths can lead future updaters forget one of them.  The
> > exit path in this function isn't pretty but I don't think the proposed
> > patch improves it either.
> > 
> 
> Should I drop the patch or add the goto? Its 5/5 so easy enough to drop
> since nothing else depends on it.

Yeah, let's drop it for now.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/