[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sjke1a53.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:09:36 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:23:26 +0100, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Nikunj A. Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> So could we please approach this from the benchmarked workload
> angle first? The highest improvement is in ebizzy:
>
> > ebizzy 2vm (improved 15 times, i.e. 1520%)
>
> What's behind this huge speedup? Does ebizzy use user-space
> spinlocks perhaps? Could we do something on the user-space side
> to get a similar speedup?
>
This is from the perf run on the host:
Baseline:
16.22% qemu-kvm [kvm_intel] [k] free_kvm_area
8.27% qemu-kvm [kvm] [k] start_apic_timer
7.53% qemu-kvm [kvm] [k] kvm_put_guest_fpu
Gang:
24.44% qemu-kvm [kvm_intel] [k] free_kvm_area
13.42% qemu-kvm [kvm] [k] start_apic_timer
9.91% qemu-kvm [kvm] [k] kvm_put_guest_fpu
Ingo, Avi, I am not getting anything obvious from this. Any ideas?
Regards
Nikunj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists