linux-kernel - Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix select_idle_sibling() regression in selecting an idle SMT sibling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:52:24 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	alex shi <lkml.alex@...il.com>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	efault@....de, alex.shi@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix select_idle_sibling() regression
 in selecting an idle SMT sibling

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 20:33 +0800, alex shi wrote:
> > Fix it. Slightly bigger patch of cleaning all these goto's etc
> > is queued up for the next release.
> >
> 
> Even with this fix, the loopback netperf testing TCP-RR, still have
> about 5% regresion on our 2 socket * 8 cores SNB machine.
> which is your patchset includes all cleaning? wondering if that is helpful.

Sorry, but that question fails to parse here. What were you asking?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/