[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF1D97E.3000201@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:05:02 +0400
From: Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@...aro.org>
To: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@...eaurora.org>
CC: linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay()
On 12/21/2011 03:25 PM, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
> I have posted similar patch some time back.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm/2119.
>
> Would you like to comment on that?
- I believe we should forget about jiffies, HZ and other similar obsolete
timekeeping stuff;
- I have no ideas where did you get 'most typical' 20 ms. MMC subsystem uses
mmc_delay() with two compile-time fixed values 1 and 10 ms, with the only
exception of card-dependent sleep/awake timeout. I was unable to find a table
with typical values, but it's rounded up to >= 1 ms anyway.
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists