linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] slab fixes for 3.2-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111221170940.GC9213@google.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:09:40 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] slab fixes for 3.2-rc4

Hello,

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:08:48AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Sure but well-defined semantics alone are not sufficient for a
> reasonable API. It's not at all obvious which one of the four variants
> to pick when writing code. I don't see any evidence that people
> actually understand the API. On the contrary, I see bugs caused by API
> confusion in mm/slub.c itself!

Sure, I agree.  If nobody beats me to it, I'll try to clean it up for
the merge window after the coming one (ie. 3.4).  But please feel free
to submit patches to gut out cruft and clean up.  I'll be happy to
apply them.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/