[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABE8wwuO7=Jo2RkrBFgnvuQP2X5UAohP-ZdWg6WejXUe+XRYyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:37:17 -0800
From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>, Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>, axboe@...nel.dk,
Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Ed Nadolski <edmund.nadolski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix blk_queue_end_tag()
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:30:14PM -0800, Williams, Dan J wrote:
>> @@ -284,16 +284,7 @@ void blk_queue_end_tag(struct request_queue *q,
>> struct request *rq)
>> struct blk_queue_tag *bqt = q->queue_tags;
>> int tag = rq->tag;
>>
>> - BUG_ON(tag == -1);
>> -
>> - if (unlikely(tag >= bqt->max_depth)) {
>> - /*
>> - * This can happen after tag depth has been reduced.
>> - * But tag shouldn't be larger than real_max_depth.
>> - */
>> - WARN_ON(tag >= bqt->real_max_depth);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> + BUG_ON(tag == -1 || tag > bqt->real_max_depth);
>
> or ...
>
> - int tag = rq->tag;
> + unsigned tag = rq->tag;
> + BUG_ON(tag >= bqt->real_max_depth);
>
> since tags in the range INT_MIN to -2 are also a bug, right?
Yes, even better... patch coming up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists