linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EF23FA4.7080507@xenotime.net>
Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:20:52 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
CC:	Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)

On 12/21/2011 11:02 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:57:19AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 08:39 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>>> Hi Randy,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 12:44 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20111216:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (not new today, just not reported earlier)
>>> John applied my fix for this one. It should be fixed now.
>>
>> Hi Samuel,
>>
>> Is this supposed to be fixed in linux-next?
>> It still fails today (linux-next 20111221).
>>
>>
>> data.c:(.text+0x3e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>> data.c:(.text+0x400): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>> ntf.c:(.text+0xb60): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>> ntf.c:(.text+0xb80): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>> rsp.c:(.text+0x750): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>> rsp.c:(.text+0x770): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>> netlink.c:(.text+0x14e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>> netlink.c:(.text+0x1500): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>> af_nfc.c:(.text+0xe0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>> af_nfc.c:(.text+0x100): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>> rawsock.c:(.text+0x1000): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>> rawsock.c:(.text+0x1020): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> 
> I have this commit in wireless-next, been there a couple of days:

Apparently this patch is not sufficient.  There is still a build problem.


> commit 645d35902c8f05a1b12fa838aa9052d8eeaf161e
> Author: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> Date:   Fri Dec 16 15:03:36 2011 +0100
> 
>     NFC: Fix LLCP related build failure
>     
>     llcp_mac routines should be static and inlined or build will fail with NFC
>     selected without LLCP.
>     
>     This patch fixes:
>     
>     LD [M]  net/nfc/nfc.o
>     net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
>     netlink.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>     net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
>     net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
>     netlink.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>     net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
>     net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
>     (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>     net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
>     net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
>     (.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>     net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
>     net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
>     rawsock.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
>     net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
>     net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
>     rawsock.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
>     net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
>     Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
> 


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/