linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/5] kgdb, softlockup: Remove touch_softlockup_watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1324502265-24521-6-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:17:45 -0500
From:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	avi@...hat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] kgdb, softlockup:  Remove touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync

The previous softlockup patches remove the delayed timestamp
and instead just stamp the time at invocation of
touch_softlockup_watchdog.  As a result, I don't think
touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync is needed anymore because
the call to cpu_clock() mimics what the _sync command
was trying to do.

I haven't tested this to see if this is true, instead I did
this on code inspection.

Jason, do you think you can test this and let me know if it
works?

CC: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h     |    4 ----
 kernel/debug/debug_core.c |    2 +-
 kernel/watchdog.c         |    6 ------
 3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b1e4364..c896830 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -311,7 +311,6 @@ extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
 extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
-extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void);
 extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 				  void __user *buffer,
 				  size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
@@ -321,9 +320,6 @@ void lockup_detector_init(void);
 static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
 {
 }
-static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
-{
-}
 static inline void lockup_detector_init(void)
 {
 }
diff --git a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
index 0d7c087..58f74e3 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int kgdb_reenter_check(struct kgdb_state *ks)
 
 static void dbg_touch_watchdogs(void)
 {
-	touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
+	touch_softlockup_watchdog();
 	clocksource_touch_watchdog();
 	rcu_cpu_stall_reset();
 }
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 4d242f5..a9fb54c 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -154,12 +154,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_nmi_watchdog);
 
 #endif
 
-void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
-{
-	sched_clock_tick();
-	__touch_watchdog();
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
 /* watchdog detector functions */
 static int is_hardlockup(void)
-- 
1.7.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/