| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:49:00 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>, Benjamin Block <bebl@...eta.org>, Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, eranian@...gle.com, brgerst@...il.com, Andreas.Herrmann3@....com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Block <benjamin.block@....com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [RFC 4/5] x86, perf: implements lwp-perf-integration (rc1) On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:22:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote: > > I hate to re-enter this thread, but this "niche use case" is > > exactly what LWP is designed for. [...] > > It's not the only usecase that it can be used in, and that is > what matters to me. The really sad thing about it is, that this only matters to you. At least I have seen nobody in this thread yet who joined or agreed on your line of reasoning. Especially sad is that your NAK based on this also prevents that all the people who want to use LWP in the intended way on Linux can't use it too. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists