linux-kernel - Re: [resend PATCH for 3.2] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:56:24 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...lcity.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [resend PATCH for 3.2] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with
 cputime64_t

On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:50:06 +0100
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> 
> > From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
> > Subject: procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t
> >
> > get_{idle,iowait}_time are supposed to return cputime64_t values, not
> > jiffies.  Add usecs_to_cputime64 for this.
> 
> For most architectures (which use the asm-generic/cputime.h) jiffies use
> the same unit as cputime64_t values, but ia64, powerpc and s390 make
> them different.
> 

OK, but

a) what effect does this problem have upon users of the kernel?

b) which kernel version(s) are affected?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/