[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111221155624.1555d8a4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:56:24 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...lcity.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [resend PATCH for 3.2] procfs: do not confuse jiffies with
cputime64_t
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:50:06 +0100
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
> > Subject: procfs: do not confuse jiffies with cputime64_t
> >
> > get_{idle,iowait}_time are supposed to return cputime64_t values, not
> > jiffies. Add usecs_to_cputime64 for this.
>
> For most architectures (which use the asm-generic/cputime.h) jiffies use
> the same unit as cputime64_t values, but ia64, powerpc and s390 make
> them different.
>
OK, but
a) what effect does this problem have upon users of the kernel?
b) which kernel version(s) are affected?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists