linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111221141801.8791507b21aa3531bf59c42e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:18:01 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@...are.com>,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

Hi Dave,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c between commit e7ac9211f29f ("vmwgfx:
Refactor kms code to use vmw_user_lookup_handle helper") from Linus' tree
and commit 308e5bcbdb10 ("drm: add an fb creation ioctl that takes a
pixel format v5") from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Dave, you might like to merge the branch you sent to Linus into your
drm-next branch to fix this up.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
index 8aa1dbb,1748a71..0000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
@@@ -1123,29 -1041,46 +1131,29 @@@ static struct drm_framebuffer *vmw_kms_
  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
  	}
  
 -	/**
 -	 * End conditioned code.
 -	 */
 -
 -	ret = vmw_user_surface_lookup_handle(dev_priv, tfile,
 -					     mode_cmd.handle, &surface);
 +	/* returns either a dmabuf or surface */
 +	ret = vmw_user_lookup_handle(dev_priv, tfile,
- 				     mode_cmd->handle,
++				     mode_cmd.handle,
 +				     &surface, &bo);
  	if (ret)
 -		goto try_dmabuf;
 -
 -	if (!surface->scanout)
 -		goto err_not_scanout;
 -
 -	ret = vmw_kms_new_framebuffer_surface(dev_priv, file_priv, surface,
 -					      &vfb, &mode_cmd);
 -
 -	/* vmw_user_surface_lookup takes one ref so does new_fb */
 -	vmw_surface_unreference(&surface);
 -
 -	if (ret) {
 -		DRM_ERROR("failed to create vmw_framebuffer: %i\n", ret);
 -		ttm_base_object_unref(&user_obj);
 -		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 -	} else
 -		vfb->user_obj = user_obj;
 -	return &vfb->base;
 -
 -try_dmabuf:
 -	DRM_INFO("%s: trying buffer\n", __func__);
 -
 -	ret = vmw_user_dmabuf_lookup(tfile, mode_cmd.handle, &bo);
 -	if (ret) {
 -		DRM_ERROR("failed to find buffer: %i\n", ret);
 -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 -	}
 -
 -	ret = vmw_kms_new_framebuffer_dmabuf(dev_priv, bo, &vfb,
 -					     &mode_cmd);
 -
 -	/* vmw_user_dmabuf_lookup takes one ref so does new_fb */
 -	vmw_dmabuf_unreference(&bo);
 +		goto err_out;
 +
 +	/* Create the new framebuffer depending one what we got back */
 +	if (bo)
 +		ret = vmw_kms_new_framebuffer_dmabuf(dev_priv, bo, &vfb,
- 						     mode_cmd);
++						     &mode_cmd);
 +	else if (surface)
 +		ret = vmw_kms_new_framebuffer_surface(dev_priv, file_priv,
- 						      surface, &vfb, mode_cmd);
++						      surface, &vfb, &mode_cmd);
 +	else
 +		BUG();
 +
 +err_out:
 +	/* vmw_user_lookup_handle takes one ref so does new_fb */
 +	if (bo)
 +		vmw_dmabuf_unreference(&bo);
 +	if (surface)
 +		vmw_surface_unreference(&surface);
  
  	if (ret) {
  		DRM_ERROR("failed to create vmw_framebuffer: %i\n", ret);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped