linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] microblaze: Remove NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EF2E50A.7040506@monstr.eu>
Date:	Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:06:34 +0100
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] microblaze: Remove NO_IRQ from architecture

Ryan Mallon wrote:
> On 22/12/11 01:32, Michal Simek wrote:
> 
>> NO_IRQ shouldn't be used by any driver. All Microblaze
>> drivers are fixed that's why NO_IRQ can be removed.
> 
> 
> This only describes half of what the patch does. You should also state
> that arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c has references to NO_IRQ removed.
> Maybe it' worth splitting this patch in half so the final patch just
> does the removal of the NO_IRQ definition, but maybe that is overkill?

I have decided to remove NO_IRQ from arch/microblaze in one patch.
It is less painful because if there is any problem with PCI you can revert
just one patch instead of two.

Drivers out of arch/microblaze must be in separate patches.


> Other than that, for the whole series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>

Thanks,
Michal


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/