[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111222082243.GD11715@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:22:43 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, david@...morbit.com,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: br_write_lock locks on possible CPUs other than online CPUs
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:20:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:02:15 +0000 Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:12:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > off-topic, but the lockdep stuff in include/linux/lglock.h
> > > (LOCKDEP_INIT_MAP and DEFINE_LGLOCK_LOCKDEP) appears to be dead code.
> >
> > Um? See ..._lock_init(); it's used there.
>
> oops, I had Andi's patch applied.
>
> Wanna take a look at it while things are fresh in your mind?
Double checked: DEFINE_LGLOCK_LOCKDEP is dead now and can be removed.
The stuff it declared is in the struct lglock now.
I can send a patch for that tomorrow if you haven't done it already.
LOCKDEP_INIT_MAP should be still used in lg_lock_init() and that
is called
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists